SOEPpapers 248, 51 S.
Patrick A. Puhani, Katja Sonderhof
2009
get_appDownload (PDF 0.81 MB)
Published in: Journal of Health Economics 29 (2010), No.2, 285-302
We evaluate the effects of a reduction in sick pay from 100 to 80% of the wage. Unlike previous literature, apart from absence from work, we also consider effects on doctor/hospital visits and subjective health indicators. We also add to the literature by estimating both switch-on and switch-off effects, because the reform was repealed two years later. We find a two-day reduction in the number of days of absence. Quantile regression reveals higher point estimates (both in absolute and relative terms) at higher quantiles, meaning that the reform predominantly reduced long durations of absence. In terms of health, the reform reduced the average number of days spent in hospital by almost half a day, but we cannot find robust evidence for negative effects on health outcomes or perceived liquidity constraints.
Topics: Health, Labor and employment
JEL-Classification: I18;J58;J83
Keywords: Sickness pay, absenteeism, health expenditure, hospitalization, difference-indifferences, switch on, switch off, quantile regression, intrinsic motivation
Frei zugängliche Version: (econstor)
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/150794