Berlin:
Technische Universität, Wirtschaftswiss. Dokumentation,
2003,
25, 12 S.
(Diskussionspapier / Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Dokumentation, Technische Universität Berlin ; 2003/1)
| Ernst Fehr, Urs Fischbacher, Bernhard von Rosenbladt, Jürgen Schupp, Gert G. Wagner
Bonn:
IZA,
2003,
23, 12 S.
(Discussion Paper Series / Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit ; 715)
| Ernst Fehr, Urs Fischbacher, Bernhard von Rosenbladt, Jürgen Schupp, Gert G. Wagner
Luxembourg:
CEPS / INSTEAD,
2003,
13 S.
(CHER Working Paper ; 1)
| Günther Schmaus, Adrian Birch, Kimberly Fisher, Joachim R. Frick, Antoine Haag, Gaston Schaber, Birgit Kuchler, Anne Villeret, Nicole Hegerle, Stijn Lefebure
To the best of our knowledge, most of the few methodological studies which analyze the impact of faked interviews on survey results are based on “artificial fakes” generated by project students in a “laboratory environment”. In contrast, panel data provide a unique opportunity to identify data which are actually faked by interviewers. By comparing data of two waves, unequivocal fakes are easily identifiable. ...
Luxembourg:
CEPS / INSTEAD,
2003,
356 S.
(CHER Working Paper ; 2)
| Adrian Birch, Antoine Haag, Stijn Lefebure, Anne Villeret, Günther Schmaus, Kimberly Fisher, Joachim R. Frick, Birgit Kuchler, Nicole Hegerle
Luxembourg:
CEPS / INSTEAD,
2003,
[Getr. Zählung]
(CHER Working Paper ; 3)
| Günther Schmaus, Kimberly Fisher, Joachim R. Frick, Antoine Haag, Birgit Kuchler
This paper deals with the question of selectivity of missing data on income questions in large panel surveys due to item-non-response and with imputation as one alternative strategy to cope with this issue. In contrast to cross-section surveys, the imputation of missing values in panel data can profit from longitudinal information which is available for the very same observation units from other points ...