-
London:
Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society (AGF),
2001,
| Stephen P. Jenkins, Christian Schluter, Gert G. Wagner
-
In:
Economic Bulletin
Economic Bulletin
| Stephen P. Jenkins, Chris Schluter, Gert G. Wagner
-
We compare patterns of movements into and out of poverty by children in Britain and Western Germany using data from the British Household Panel Survey and the German Socio-Economic Panel for the period 1992-97. In Britain poverty persistence was greater, and poverty exit rates in particular were lower, than in Western Germany. In both countries, poverty was particularly persistent among children in ...
In:
Journal of Comparative Family Studies
34 (2003), 3, 337-355
| Stephen P. Jenkins, Christian Schluter, Gert G. Wagner
-
Berlin:
German Institute for Economic Research,
2007,
(DIW Discussion Paper No. 694)
| Stephen P. Jenkins, Thomas Siedler
-
In:
Marcel Erlinghagen, Karsten Hank, Michaela Kreyenfeld ,
Innovation und Wissenstransfer in der empirischen Sozial- und Verhaltensforschung (Festschrift für Gert G. Wagner)
Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag
11-37
| Stephen P. Jenkins, Timothy M. Smeeding
-
In:
Oxford Economic Papers
58 (2003), 3,
| Stephen P. Jenkins, Philippe Van Kerm
-
In:
Evidenced-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
1 (2004), 2, 157-165
| Christiane Jennen, Gerhard Uhlenbruck
-
In:
Ingo Klein, Stefan Mitnik ,
Contributions to Modern Econometrics. From Data Analysis to Economic Policy
Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
1-15
| Uwe Jensen
-
This paper proposes a method to decompose changes in income inequality into the contributions of policy changes, wage rate changes, and population changes while considering labor supply reactions. Using data from the Socio‐Economic Panel (SOEP), this method is applied to decompose the increase in income inequality in Germany from 2002 to 2011, a period that saw tax reductions and a controversial overhaul ...
In:
Review of Income and Wealth
65 (2019), 3, 540-560
| Robin Jessen
-
A common assumption in the optimal taxation literature is that the social planner maximizes a welfarist social welfare function with weights decreasing with income. However, high transfer withdrawal rates in many countries imply very low weights for the working poor in practice. We reconcile this puzzle by generalizing the optimal taxation framework by Saez (2002) to allow for alternatives to welfarism. ...
Berlin:
DIW Berlin,
2017,
(SOEPpapers 953)
| Robin Jessen, Maria Metzing, Davud Rostam-Afschar