Does the choice of well-being measure matter empirically? An illustration with German data

Aufsätze in Sammelwerken 2016

Koen Decancq, Dirk Neumann

In: Matthew D. Adler, Marc Fleurbaey , The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy
Oxford University Press

Abstract

This chapter discusses and compares five measures of individual well-being, namely income, an objective composite well-being index, a measure of subjective well-being, equivalent income, and a well-being measure based on the von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities of the individuals. After examining the information requirements of these measures, the chapter illustrates their implementation using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) for 2010. This study find sizable differences in the characteristics of the individuals identified as worst off according to the different well-being measures. Less than 1% of the individuals belong to the bottom decile according to all five measures. Moreover, the measures lead to considerably different well-being rankings of the individuals. These findings highlight the importance of the choice of well-being measure for policy making.



Keywords: income, composite well-being index, life satisfaction, equivalent income, von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function, worst off, Germany.
Externer Link:
http://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.492566.de/diw_sp0717.pdf

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199325818.013.22

keyboard_arrow_up