SOEP Research: Inequality and Mobility

close
Go to page
remove add
681 results, from 371
  • Economic Bulletin

    Real Income Rose Significantly between 1991 and 2014 on Average – First Indication of Return to Increased Income Inequality

    The real disposable income of private households in Germany, accounting for inflation, rose by 12 percent between 1991 and 2014. This is what the present study based on data from the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) has shown. However, the trends varied greatly depending on income group. While the middle income segment rose by more than eight percent, the highest income segment increased by up to 26 percent. ...

    03.02.2017| Jan Goebel, Markus M. Grabka
  • Interview

    "The Gap between the rich and the poor keeps growing": seven questions for Markus M. Grabka

    Mr. Grabka, the German economy has flourished in recent years. To what extent is its economic growth reflected in the growth of income? On average across the total population disposable household income after inflation has risen, but depending on their income level, various segments of the population have contributed to this increase differently. [...]

    03.02.2017| Markus M. Grabka
  • DIW Economic Bulletin 27 / 2017

    Income Groups and Types of Employment in Germany since 1995

    This report examines how income groups and forms of employment in Germany have changed in the past two decades. Since the mid-1990s, inequality in disposable household income in Germany has generally increased. This trend was in effect until 2005. While fewer people had disposable incomes in the median range, the proportion of the population at both tails of the income distribution increased. At the ...

    2017| Peter Krause, Christian Franz, Marcel Fratzscher
  • DIW Economic Bulletin 27 / 2017

    Regular Employment Continues to Play Important Role: Interview with Peter Krause and Christian Franz

    2017
  • Economic Bulletin

    Income groups and types of employment in Germany since 1995

    This report examines how income groups and forms of employment in Germany have changed in the past two decades. Since the mid-1990s, inequality in disposable household income in Germany has generally increased. This trend was in effect until 2005. While fewer people had disposable incomes in the median range, the proportion of the population at both tails of the income distribution increased. At the ...

    14.07.2017| Christian Franz, Marcel Fratzscher, Peter Krause
  • Interview

    "Regular employment continues to play important role": Five questions for Peter Krause and Christian Franz

    Mr. Krause, you took a close look at income groups in Germany. What did you hope to accomplish? Peter Krause: We wanted to bring together two discussion threads in our study. One thread has to do with the long-term trend in inequality of household income distribution and the other, with changes in labor force participation. Until the mid-2000s, inequality in disposable household income increased and ...

    14.07.2017| Christian Franz, Peter Krause
  • Refereed essays Web of Science

    Einkommensunterschiede in der Mortalität in Deutschland – Ein empirischer Erklärungsversuch

    In dieser Studie gehen wir der Frage nach, welche Faktoren die einkommensbedingten Unterschiede in der Mortalität erklären können. Auf der Basis des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP) werden ereignisanalytische Modelle der Mortalität ab dem Alter 65 geschätzt, die Auskunft über den Mediatoreffekt von acht Faktorenbündeln geben. Als Mediatoren zwischen Einkommen zum Alter 65 und Mortalität werden Bildung, ...

    In: Zeitschrift für Soziologie 46 (2017),2, S. 124-146 | Hannes Kröger, Martin Kroh, Lars Eric Kroll, Thomas Lampert
  • Refereed essays Web of Science

    Distributive and Poverty-Reducing Effects of In-Kind Housing Benefits in Europe: With a Case Study for Germany

    While cash housing benefits are generally included in household disposable income, the effect of social housing is not accounted for. This may provide a misleading picture of the impact of overall housing policies on inequality and poverty, as countries use different policies to help households meet their housing expenses. In this article, we present the first comprehensive study of the impact of in-kind ...

    In: Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 32 (2017), 2, S. 289-312 | Gerlinde Verbist, Markus M. Grabka
  • Refereed essays Web of Science

    Measuring the Consistency of Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Income Information in EU-SILC

    The EU-wide survey “Statistics on Income and Living Conditions” (EU-SILC) is extremely important for international social science research and policy advice. It is therefore crucial to ensure that the data are of the highest quality and international comparability. This paper is aimed at identifying unexpected developments in income levels, income mobility, and inequality in the EU-SILC data between ...

    In: The Review of Income and Wealth 63 (2017), 1, S. 30-52 | Kristina Krell, Joachim R. Frick, Markus M. Grabka
  • SOEPpapers 899 / 2017

    A Head-to-Head Comparison of Augmented Wealth in Germany and the United States

    We provide levels of, compositions of, and inequalities in household augmented wealth – defined as the sum of net worth and pension wealth – for two countries: the United States and Germany. Pension wealth makes up a considerable portion of household wealth: about 48% in the United States and 61% in Germany. The higher share in Germany narrows the wealth gap between the two countries: While average ...

    2017| Timm Bönke, Markus M. Grabka, Carsten Schröder, Edward N. Wolff
681 results, from 371
keyboard_arrow_up