We analyze below-cost pricing in retail markets and examine its impact on social welfare as well as on suppliers' incentives to invest in quality. Considering negotiations about a linear wholesale price between the retailer and her suppliers, we find that below-cost pricing aggravates the double marginalization problem and causes welfare losses compared to a regime where below-cost pricing is banned. Furthermore, suppliers have stronger incentives to invest in high quality products if a ban of below-cost pricing is enforced.
Topics: Competition and Regulation
JEL-Classification: L22;L42
Keywords: Complementarities, Retailing, Below-Cost Pricing
Frei zugängliche Version: (econstor)
http://hdl.handle.net/10419/27312